The futurist Alvin Toffler has said, “The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn”. The Covid pandemic has exposed the fragile nature of life and laid bare many of the assumptions under which we unconsciously operate. While this has affected all of our life activities, nowhere has it been more stark as in our church life. Much of reform in history has happened when people were angry about the way things were. Such anger however, often results in bitterness and eventually avoiding the situation. Are there healthier ways to leverage such anger? Are there alternate models of church in the world?
The hypothetical example of a child who survived the 2004 tsunami (while many others perished around him) features in a debate between Alister McGrath and Richard Dawkins. The former endorses the appropriateness of the claim that God saved the boy; while the latter thinks that God would be extremely capricious if he behaved like that, and himself attributes the child’s survival to chance in the context of natural laws. Christian theists believe that God sustains the world rather than only having created it and set its path in motion. But could we also say ex ante that the child’s survival was determined (purely) by the laws of nature; but ex poste that God saved him?